Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forget Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account?

Please type your username.

Please type your E-Mail.

Please choose an appropriate title for the question so it can be answered easier.

Please choose the appropriate section so question can be searched easier.

Please choose suitable Keywords Ex: question, poll.

Type the description thoroughly and in details.

Choose from here the video type.

Put here the video id : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdUUx5FdySs Ex: 'sdUUx5FdySs'.

Captcha Click on image to update the captcha.

Search
Ask a Question

Home / Questions / Q 47016
Next
In Process
SABIYAKAUSER JAMKHAN

SABIYAKAUSER JAMKHAN

View Profile
  • 23
Asked: In:

What is the criteria to regularize employment of workmen in india

  • 23
Share

3 Answers

  1. H.P.Dubey

    View Profile
    Added an answer on May 4, 2018 at 12:31 pm

    What I understood from the judgment that the person cannot claim permanant employment merely because he/she has completed 240 days.

    of continuous service.
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT AURANGABAD
    Writ Petition No. 2564 of 1996
    Decided On: 25.06.2008
    Appellants: The State of Maharashtra through the Regional Dairy Development Officer and The General Manager, Government Milk Scheme
    Vs.
    Respondent: Narayan Babarao Lonikar and The Learned Judge
    [Alongwith Writ Petition Nos. 2565, 2778, 2779, 2780 and 2781 of 1996]
    Hon’ble Judges:
    P.R. Borkar, J.
    Counsels:
    For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: D.V.Tele, A.G.P. in writ petition No. 2780 of 1996 and S.S. Autade, A.G.P.
    For Respondents/Defendant: P.G. Rodge, Adv. for respondent No. 1 in writ petition No. 2780 of 1996 and D.R. Shelke, Adv. for respondent No. 1
    Subject: Labour and Industrial

    • 0

  2. H.P.Dubey

    View Profile
    Added an answer on May 4, 2018 at 12:31 pm

    What I understood from the judgment that the person cannot claim permanant employment merely because he/she has completed 240 days.

    of continuous service.
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT AURANGABAD
    Writ Petition No. 2564 of 1996
    Decided On: 25.06.2008
    Appellants: The State of Maharashtra through the Regional Dairy Development Officer and The General Manager, Government Milk Scheme
    Vs.
    Respondent: Narayan Babarao Lonikar and The Learned Judge
    [Alongwith Writ Petition Nos. 2565, 2778, 2779, 2780 and 2781 of 1996]
    Hon’ble Judges:
    P.R. Borkar, J.
    Counsels:
    For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: D.V.Tele, A.G.P. in writ petition No. 2780 of 1996 and S.S. Autade, A.G.P.
    For Respondents/Defendant: P.G. Rodge, Adv. for respondent No. 1 in writ petition No. 2780 of 1996 and D.R. Shelke, Adv. for respondent No. 1
    Subject: Labour and Industrial

    • 0

  3. H.P.Dubey

    View Profile
    Added an answer on May 4, 2018 at 12:31 pm

    What I understood from the judgment that the person cannot claim permanant employment merely because he/she has completed 240 days.

    of continuous service.
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT AURANGABAD
    Writ Petition No. 2564 of 1996
    Decided On: 25.06.2008
    Appellants: The State of Maharashtra through the Regional Dairy Development Officer and The General Manager, Government Milk Scheme
    Vs.
    Respondent: Narayan Babarao Lonikar and The Learned Judge
    [Alongwith Writ Petition Nos. 2565, 2778, 2779, 2780 and 2781 of 1996]
    Hon’ble Judges:
    P.R. Borkar, J.
    Counsels:
    For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: D.V.Tele, A.G.P. in writ petition No. 2780 of 1996 and S.S. Autade, A.G.P.
    For Respondents/Defendant: P.G. Rodge, Adv. for respondent No. 1 in writ petition No. 2780 of 1996 and D.R. Shelke, Adv. for respondent No. 1
    Subject: Labour and Industrial

    • 0

Leave an answer